From: Bill Martin (bmartin@luc.edu)
Date: Sun Aug 17 2003 - 22:32:55 CDT
I watched this thread in particular in hopes of seeing a solution for my issue. In short, reflecting incorrect counts on the admin page.
On the Subnet Overview page, some segments reflect registrations, although there are none for that segment in dhcpd.leases or dhcpd.leases~. Others report correctly.
If I drill down into segments that reflect registrations (that do not actually have them in the leases file) the drill down results in no registrations names reflected, although the SubnetOverview reflects that there are.
On some segments, it reflects a given number, but it does not match what is actually in the leases table. If I drill down into these segments, the results page show the correct number.
I have parsing dhcp.leases and dhcpd.leases~ to insure they are parallel (which they are) but admin.cgi does not reflect the correct number.
I saw a post about the format for subnet.dat by Patrick, and oddly enough, it does not work.
Using:
a.b.c.d/24:NetworkName:200:10.z.c.d/24: yield no results on segments that I have registrations. Additionally, it sorts the output page oddly (which seems to have been corrected in a post by Robert which I have not tried)
What works for those segments that I have registrations on is in the format of:
x:DormName(/24):10.z.x.0:
Suggestions?
-bill-
-Bill Martin-
Sr. Systems Analyst
Loyola University Chicago
bmartin@luc.edu
**********************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail message to
majordomo@southwestern.edu containing a single line with the words:
unsubscribe netreg
Send requests for assistance to: owner-netreg@southwestern.edu
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Aug 12 2004 - 12:01:40 CDT