From: Geoff LeBoldus (leboldug@post.queensu.ca)
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 16:08:49 CDT
At 09:40 AM 2003-07-22 -0400, you wrote:
>You might want to try a config like I posted a while ago:
>
>http://www.southwestern.edu/ITS/netreg/archive/0629.html
>
>In that example, using the shared-network clause, I have 3 subnets servicing
>the same "wire" All three addresses are RFC1918, but only two of them are
>routed by our router.
Here's what I'd like to have one NetReg server manage:
ResNet: 48 subnets off a class B with both known and unknown pools per subnet
Library and other locations: 10 subnets off a 10.x.x.x private address
space with both known and unknown pools.
These subnets aren't on the same wire. I believe that I would need 2
interfaces, too, one each for the private and public IP ranges.Or are you
saying that I should route 10.x.x.x IPs on our backbone to the NetReg server?
The Library would also have wireless clients, but I don't think that's an
issue. At some point we'll move off NetReg for wireless and use
Bluesocket/Vernier/etc.
-- Geoff LeBoldus Systems Programmer Information Technology Services********************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail message to majordomo@southwestern.edu containing a single line with the words: unsubscribe netreg Send requests for assistance to: owner-netreg@southwestern.edu **********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Aug 12 2004 - 12:01:40 CDT